Integrated Leadership Styles in Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review of Literature

Herrickson C. Gudito

Graduate School, Bulacan State University, Malolos City, Bulacan, Philippines   

Leonora F. De Jesus

Graduate School, Bulacan State University, Malolos City, Bulacan, Philippines 

Abstract

This study explores the diverse leadership styles employed in educational institutions, emphasizing the concept of integrated leadership and its role in adapting to varying organizational contexts. It seeks to identify prevailing leadership styles and assess their impact on teacher motivation, performance, and organizational outcomes. A systematic review of literature, such as books and academic papers, was carried out to examine the topic of educational leadership thoroughly and impartially. The evaluation pinpointed six leadership styles: authoritarian, bureaucratic, transformational, democratic, instructional, and transactional. Each with its own distinct influence on teacher retention, morale, and job performance. Combining instructional leadership was highlighted as particularly effective in promoting positive organizational results through the improvement of teaching and learning environments. Effective leadership in schools and colleges requires flexibility and the integration of diverse leadership styles to address organizational needs. Aligning leadership strategies with institutional goals and member dynamics fosters motivation, enhances performance, and drives long-term organizational success. 

Keywords:  leadership styles, educational leadership, integrated leadership

How to cite:

Gudito, H., & De Jesus, L. (2024). Integrated Leadership Styles in Educational Institutions: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation. 2(4), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.17613/vrpsd-89426.

References: 

Arombo, C.M. (2023). Master Teachers-School Heads Designate’s Instructional Competencies, Instructional Leadership Practices and Challenges. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(9), 1–1. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10406078

Amzat, I. H., Yanti, P. G., & Suswandari, S. (2022). Estimating the Effect of Principal Instructional and Distributed Leadership on Professional Development of Teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221109585

Agasisti, T., Bowers, A. J., & Soncin, M. (2019). School principals’ leadership types and student achievement in the Italian context: Empirical results from a three-step latent class analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(6), 860–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218768577

Amanchukwu, R.N., Stanley, G.J., & Ololube, N.P. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management. ResearchGate. DOI:10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The Moderation Role of Transformational Leadership in the Effect of Instructional Leadership on Teacher Professional Learning and Instructional Practice: An Integrated Leadership Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079

Dacpano, E. B. (2022). The Influence of School Heads’ Transformational Leadership on Schools’ Performance: The Case of City Schools Division of San Fernando, La Union. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(9), 1–1. doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.03.09.12

Fiskia Rera Baharuddin, Amiruddin Amiruddin, & A. Muhammad Idkhan. (2023). Integrated Leadership Effect on Teacher Satisfaction: Mediating Effects of Teacher Collaboration and Professional Development. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research.  https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.17

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools. Wallace Foundation. https://doi.org/10.59656/EL-SB1065.001 

Hasan, E., Khajeh, A., Abu, M., & Asaari, H. (2018). Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Performance. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2018(2166-0018), 2166–2184. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.687849

Kwan, P. (2020). Is Transformational Leadership Theory Passé? Revisiting the Integrative Effect of Instructional Leadership and Transformational Leadership on Student Outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19861137

Lambrecht, J., Lenkeit, J., Hartmann, A., Ehlert, A., Knigge, M., & Spörer, N. (2020). The effect of school leadership on implementing inclusive education: how transformational and instructional leadership practices affect individualized education planning. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752825

Laurențiu MIHAI (2021). Study Regarding the Leadership Styles Practiced in Catalan SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of EU Research in Business, Vol. 2021 (2021), Article ID 414966, https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.414966

Maheshwari, G. (2021). Influence of Teacher-Perceived Transformational and Transactional School Leadership on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Performance: A Case of Vietnam; https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1866020

Moti, L. A. L. (2021). Who’s the boss? Exploring the academic leadership styles of principals in non-traditional preschools. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education. Retrieved from https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/ali/article/view/8578

Mullins, C. M. (2024). The Influence of Principal Leadership Style on Teacher Retention. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2969216685?sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses

Özdemir, M., Kaymak, M. N., & Çetin, O. U. (2023). Unlocking teacher potential: The integrated influence of empowering leadership and authentic leadership on teacher self-efficacy and agency in Turkey. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231217136

Printy, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed Leadership Globally: The Interactive Nature of Principal and Teacher Leadership in 32 Countries. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(2), 290-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20926548

Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. (2020). From Principals to Teachers to Students: Exploring an Integrative Model for Predicting Students’ Achievements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(5), 736-778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20907133

Shava, G. N. (2021). Principal leadership and school performance: Integrating instructional and transformational leadership in South African schools’ context. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.119

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Soncin, M., Bowers, A. J., & Agasisti, T. (2024). A global perspective on school leadership: Evidence from a latent class analysis on OECD TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241231902

Thanh, N. H., & Quang, N. V. (2022). Transformational, Transactional, Laissez-faire Leadership Styles and Employee Engagement: Evidence from Vietnam’s Public Sector. SAGE Open, 12(2), 215824402210946-215824402210946. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221094606

Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2023). Lifelong Learning in the Educational Setting: A Systematic Literature Review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00738-w

Veletić, J., & Olsen, R. V. (2021). Exploring school leadership profiles across the world: a cluster analysis approach to TALIS 2018. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1953612

Zhang, J. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Transformational School Leadership on Teacher Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v8i1.6875