References:

Ahmed, S. M., & Palermo, A.-G. S. (2010). Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137

Aldridge, J. (2015). Participatory research: Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice (1st ed.). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t8933q

Alessandrini, M. (July 10-13). Non-positivist approaches to research in the third sector: Empowered policy-making. ISTR 10th International Conference, Siena, Italy.

Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2).

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (2018). Social psychology (Ninth edition, global edition). Pearson.

Badampudi, D., Fotrousi, F., Cartaxo, B., & Usman, M. (2022). Reporting consent, anonymity and confidentiality procedures adopted in empirical studies using human participants. E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, 16(1), 220109. https://doi.org/10.37190/e-Inf220109

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (Second edition). Anol Bhattacherjee.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Blum, L. (2004). Stereotypes and stereotyping: a moral analysis. Philosophical Papers, 33(3), 251–289.

Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In J. Bos, Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7

Bukamal, H. (2022). Deconstructing insider–outsider researcher positionality. British Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12426

Bumbuc, Ş. (2016). About subjectivity in qualitative data interpretation. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, XXII (2).

Cheek, J. (2008). Researching collaboratively: Implications for qualitative research and researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 18(11), 1599–1603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308324865

Chiseri-Strater, E. (1996). Turning in upon ourselves: Positionality, subjectivity, and reflexivity in case study and ethnographic research. In Peter Mortensen & Gesa E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy. National Council of Teachers of English.

Ciesielska, M. (2017). Qualitative methodologies in organization studies - volume I: Theories and new approaches. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cippitani, R. (2023). Consent requirements: What are the terms and conditions of informed consent? In V. Colcelli, R. Cippitani, C. Brochhausen-Delius, & R. Arnold (Eds.), GDPR Requirements for Biobanking Activities Across Europe (pp. 97–108). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42944-6_11

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed). Sage Publications.

Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Cultural competence in research. (2010). The Harvard clinical and translational science center.

Davis, M. (2020). The “culture” in cultural competence. In J. Frawley, G. Russell, & J. Sherwood (Eds.), Cultural Competence and the Higher Education Sector (pp. 15–29). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5362-2_2

Diver, S. W., & Higgins, M. N. (2014). Giving back through collaborative research: Towards a practice of dynamic reciprocity. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2).

Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In J. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. Esses, The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 3–28). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n1

Drapeau, M. (2015). Subjectivity in research: Why not? but…. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2002.1972

Ebbs, C. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Inquiry: Issues of Power and Ethics. Education 3-13, 117, 217.

Ederio, N. T., P. Inocian, E., I. Calaca, N., & M. Espiritu, J. G. (2023). Ethical research practices in educational institutions: A literature review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i5-02

Edwards, D. J. (2015). Dissemination of research results: On the path to practice change. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(6). https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i6.1503

Empowering research participants: Carol Rippey Massat and Marta Lundy. (1997). Affilia, 12(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/088610999701200103

Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. L. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method research: A social justice perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 5(2).

Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B., & Caplan, A. L. (2017). Rethinking the Belmont report? The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482

Gair, S. (2012). Feeling their stories: Contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420580

Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708

George, M. S., Gaitonde, R., Davey, R., Mohanty, I., & Upton, P. (2023). Engaging participants with research findings: A rights‐informed approach. Health Expectations, 26(2), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13701

Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 1025–1046). Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Ghooi, R. (2011). The Nuremberg Code-A critique. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.80371

González-Duarte, A., Zambrano-González, E., Medina-Franco, H., Alberú-Gómez, J., Durand-Carbajal, M., Hinojosa, C. A., Aguilar-Salinas, C. A., & Kaufer-Horwitz, M. (2020). II. The research ethics involving vulnerable groups. Revista de Investigación Clínica, 71(4), 1932. https://doi.org/10.24875/RIC.19002812

Gordon, B. G. (2020). Vulnerability in research: Basic ethical concepts and general approach to review. Ochsner Journal, 20(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0079

Graber, A., & Maguire, A. (2024). Clinical informed consent and ABA. Behavior Analysis in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00902-0

Griffin, R. W. (2013). Management (11th ed). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Head, G. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315

Horsfall, M., Eikelenboom, M., Draisma, S., & Smit, J. H. (2021). The effect of rapport on data quality in face-to-face interviews: Beneficial or detrimental? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010858

Imran, M., Samad, S., Maaz, M., Qadeer, A., Najmi, A., & Aqil, M. (2013). Hippocratic oath and conversion of ethico-regulatory aspects onto doctors as a physician, private individual and a clinical investigator. Journal of Mid-Life Health, 4(4), 203. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.122232

Institute for Work & Health Privacy Committee. (2020). Privacy, confidentiality and data security: Handbook of research policies and procedures. Institute for Work & Health.

Kahn, H. J. (2000). Voluntary consent for participation in research in the twenty-first century. Brain and Language, 71(1), 110–112. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2226

Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2021). Ethical conducts in qualitative research methodology: participant observation and interview process. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 2(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.15722/JRPE.2.2.202109.5

Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., & Pessach, L. (2009). Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306

Ketefian, S. (2015). Ethical considerations in research. Focus on vulnerable groups. Invest Educ Enferm, 33(1), 164–172.

Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L., & Sugarman, J. (2004). The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160490497083

Ligocki, D. T. (2019). Viewing research for social justice and equity through the lens of Zygmunt Bauman’s theory of liquid modernity. In K. K. Strunk & L. A. Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity in education. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427

Lippmann, W. (1997). Public opinion. Transaction Publishers.

Lorenzetti, L. (2013). Research as a social justice tool: An activist’s perspective. Affiliate, 28(4), 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109913505815

Maksimović, J., & Evtimov, J. (2023). Positivism and post-positivism as the basis of quantitative research in pedagogy. Research in Pedagogy, 13(1), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2301208M

Marín-González, E., Malmusi, D., Camprubí, L., & Borrell, C. (2017). The role of dissemination as a fundamental part of a research project: Lessons learned from SOPHIE. International Journal of Health Services, 47(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731416676227

Marshall, P. A., Adebamowo, C. A., Adeyemo, A. A., Ogundiran, T. O., Strenski, T., Zhou, J., & Rotimi, C. N. (2014). Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-38

Meyer, S. S. (2008). Ancient ethics: A critical introduction (1. publ). Routledge.

Mirza, H., Bellalem, F., & Mirza, C. (2023). Ethical considerations in Qualitative research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 5(11), 441–449.

Mizock, L., & Harkins, D. A. (2022). Culturally competent methodology: Multicultural research theory. In Researcher race: Social constructions in the research process. EBSCO Publishing.

Mumford, M. D., Higgs, C., & Gujar, Y. (2021). Ethics in coercive environments: Ensuring voluntary participation in research. In S. Panicker & B. Stanley (Eds.), Handbook of research ethics in psychological science. (pp. 113–123). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000258-008

National ethical guidelines for health research in Nepal and standard operating procedures. (2011). Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC).

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7. ed., Pearson new internet ed). Pearson.

Nursey-Bray, M. (2020). Community engagement: What Is It? In D. Hes & C. Hernandez-Santin (Eds.), Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment (pp. 83–105). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9624-4_5

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96.

Paasche-Orlow, M. (2004). The ethics of cultural competence: Academic Medicine, 79(4), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200404000-00012

Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino, A. R. (2020). The Positivism paradigm of research: Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690–694. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Peñaranda, F., Vélez-Zapata, C., & Bloom, L. R. (2013). Research from a Social Justice perspective: The systematization of an experience. International Review of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2013.6.1.37

Polush, D. J., & Boltz, P. (2017). The ethics of critical inquiry: Educational research informed by Parrhēsia. Critical Questions in Education, 8(2), 82–100.

Powell, K. M., & Takayoshi, P. (2003). Accepting roles created for us: The ethics of reciprocity. College Composition and Communication, 54(3), 394. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594171

Practical and ethical dilemmas in researching sensitive topics with populations considered vulnerable. (2020). MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

Publication and dissemination of research: A guide supporting the Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. (2020). National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia.

Qualitative psychology nexus, Vol. II: The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology. (2002). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.10336

Ramos, M. C. (1989). Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 12, 57–63.

Reason, P. (Ed.). (1994). Participation in human inquiry. Sage Publications.

Resnik, D. B. (2018). Privacy and confidentiality. In D. B. Resnik, The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects (Vol. 74, pp. 149–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8_6

Savin-Baden, M. (Ed.). (2010). New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty. Routledge.

Shaw, R. M., Howe, J., Beazer, J., & Carr, T. (2020). Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups. Qualitative Research, 20(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119841839

Sigaud, C. H. de S., Rezende, M. A., Veríssimo, M. D. L. Ó. R., Ribeiro, M. O., Montes, D. C., Piccolo, J., De Souza, J. M., & Marins, S. S. (2009). Ethical issues and strategies for the voluntary participation of children in research. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 43(Spe 2), 1336–1340.

Starovoytova, D. (2017). Scientific research, writing, and dissemination (Part 4/4): Dissemination of scholarly publications. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(28).

Strier, R. (2006). Anti-oppressive research in social work: A preliminary definition. British Journal of Social Work, 37(5), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl062

Sue, D. W. (2019). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (Eighth edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Thomas, D., & Zubkov, P. (2023). Quantitative research designs. In quantitative research for practical Theology. Andrews University Press.

Wang, S., & Zhu, P. (2013). The roles and responsibilities of the educational researcher. Education Research Frontier, 3(3), 92–95.

Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? Bloomsbury Academic.

Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(88)90024-6

WMA declaration of Helsinki-ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. (2013). 64th WMA General Assembly